Can You Afford (Not) to Sue ?

>yours, or will they be turned off by a vendor who they
This article outlines the 3 questions you should - orview as litigious? Moreover, if you sue, chances are
must - have answered before you decide to beginthat L will defend this case by asserting that your
litigation.products were defective - whether true or not - which
Copyright (c) 2008 Law Offices of Jonathan Cooperwill force you to defend the efficacy of your products
You're a manufacturer of specialty labels who hasin a public forum. Again, you should ponder whether
worked with this customer - we'll call them "C" -- forhaving the quality of your product publicly questioned is
over three years, and filled several orders for them,likely to impact your bottom line.
including one for over 250,000 units, which netted your(2) What is the cost to me if I DON'T sue?
company a profit of over $50,000. Now, after filling C's(a) No Lawsuit, No Payment - On the other hand, if
latest order, which was for another 300,000 units,you don't sue, you are certainly not going to get paid
several months have gone by and you have not beenwhat you are owed. Worse, your decision not to sue
paid; and although you've never had this problem in themay lead other customers to view you as "soft," and
past, they've stopped taking your company's phonestart trying to force you to reduce your bills, which will
calls.negatively impact your bottom line.
You inquire through the grapevine that brought you this(b) Reputation - In the same vein, your existing
client to begin with, and you learn that C has retainedcustomers (as well as your prospective customers)
another vendor through one of C's employees' familymay view your unwillingness to pursue outstanding
connections. While you accept that these thingsdebts as a concession that you don't really believe in
happen in business, that doesn't change the fact that Cthe value of your product.
still hasn't paid you.(3) What is the likely outcome if I sue? At the risk of
While most people's knee-jerk reaction is that youstating the obvious, if your chances of prevailing at trial
should sue them to recover your outstanding bill forare outweighed by the anticipated legal fees to get
services rendered, that isn't necessarily the rightthere, you should not sue. For example, if you stand a
answer. The more reasoned and balanced approach50% chance of winning the case against L, it will cost
would require you (and your attorney) to consider theyou $45,000 to litigate the case, and your best-case
following:scenario is winning a $60,000 verdict, it does not make
(1) What is the cost to me if I sue?financial sense, on these limited facts, to litigate the
(a) Legal Fees - Although the old joke is that there arecase. In this scenario, the better course of action would
only 2 certainties in this world -- death and taxes - thatbe to try and negotiate a settlement before
is not entirely accurate; if you sue, there will be legalcommencing formal suit.
fees, and if the amount of any judgment you couldIn short, before you jump head-first into litigation, you
possibly recover will either be nullified in its entirety, orshould get the answers to these questions from your
approach the amount of the legal fees you will incur toattorney. By establishing what the reasonable
recover payment, then suing is probably not the bestexpectations for the litigation are, it will not only give
option.you greater peace of mind, but will also give your
(b) Reputation - In addition, you should considerattorney the financial framework within which he
whether your other customers are likely to hear aboutneeds to operate, thereby saving you money down
your lawsuit, and if so, what their reaction to it will be:the line.
will they respect you for pursuing what is rightfully